|
|
|
I believe that sometime early
in our nation's history, there must have been one genetically
mutated, Tennessee-Williams-type family that extended its
tentacles out all over the continent and created a mass of
smoldering parent child sibling relationships which would
require generations of psychiatrists and pop therapy fads to
extinguish. Lately, I've been working a lot on this theory, but
before I go on, I should perhaps say that I am neither a social
nor natural scientist, but a comic book author, and that the
method of my approach to this problem may have logical flaws.
Nevertheless, as I remember from my Psychology 101 and Biology
100 classes, evolution or mutation is often tested by means of
studies that followed the members of an identified gene pool
through several generations. Thus, through the study of my own
family, I am hoping not only to substantiate my hypothesis, but
also get to the bottom of some personal turmoil.
Unfortunately, as I almost immediately discovered, getting the
facts down is a major problem, since the "facts" of our family
history have always surfaced in anecdotes or unrelated narrative
fragments, told at odd times. For example, although I remember
hearing that my Great Grandma Gaine came over the Rockies and
out to the coast in a covered wagon – maybe on the Oregon Trail,
maybe on the Donner Trail– this information was not introduced
in a bedtime story or even a coherent anecdote, but during the
course of a family squabble. My parents never told stories.
Maybe they didn't realize the importance of family history or
maybe they didn't think I would be interested. For whatever
reason, the result has been that in my life-long search for the
facts, I have been left to my own resources. This is also true
of many of my cousins, by the way, most of whom I have
interrogated thoroughly and who report knowing nothing about the
family past. Not that their testimony is always reliable.
I, on the other hand, was an intuitively suspicious child, who
imagined wiggly secrets hiding in the recesses of the family
history, and so I kept my ears and eyes open. I think I hoped
that knowing about my ancestors would teach me where to put up
my guard. In time, my own observations began to merge with the
bits of fact and family myth thrown my way to reveal the
filigree threads of a massive story line. I noticed, for
example, that my father's generation was greatly influenced by
the Great Depression and that each member of this generation
views this period of history as a personal crisis. The same is
true of The War. Although I discovered that my father, George
Golden, and his twin sister Lucy were born after the Depression
and that he was therefore too young to serve in WWII, his older
brothers and sisters were active participants in economic
struggle and the fight for world freedom. In fact, the way it
was told, each generation in my family struggled along in the
middle of its assigned crisis and life was one long battle for
survival, even though, from my perspective, most of it sounded
suspiciously like a story of upward mobility.
At other times, watching the proffered snatches and episodes of
family narrative piece themselves together before my eyes has
been like a private viewing of Psycho. First I saw vague images
behind the shower curtain, heard a strange scratchy voice in the
attic, and then I began to suspect that Great Grandma might well
have been one of the members of the Donner Party, who ate their
fellows in order to survive an unplanned winter in the Sierras,
an historical event which occurred before the construction of
Highway 80 and the introduction of the ski lodge to Squaw
Valley.
I suppose my mind is not especially linear, which may be why it
is more occupied with trying to imagine a fantastic world into
which all of the fragments fit, rather than trying to eliminate
one at the expense of the other. For example, I decided early on
that if upward mobility takes place in a dog–eat–dog world,
cannibalism is a reasonable assumption, a chain of thoughts
which led right into the fixed idea of my childhood that my
Great Grandmother had been at Donner Pass. I even put this
theory forth in a report when I was in fifth grade, which led my
teacher to lecture the entire class on the difference between
fact and fiction. His remarks did not affect me, since I had
already decided that differentiating fact from fiction was not
as central to my personal reality as differentiating good
fiction from bad.
Anyway, to return to key motifs and general themes in my
parents' generation – although war troubled their childhoods,
their adolescence coincided with an era of post-war progress and
the advent of track housing, the Nouveau New Deal version of
forty acres and a mule. A chicken in every pot was long past.
They were heading toward a car in every garage and a television
in every room. They could therefore claim the war as the trauma
of their early development and the rebuilding of the entire
Western World as the burden of their adult lives.
My generation's lack of significant story line, on the other
hand, was our major burden, since as far as our parents were
concerned, we grew up in enlightened, secure homes, with no real
problems. Certainly we had nothing as well publicized and
prominent as their war, not until recently, and so we were
criticized for our lack of motivation. However, I don't think
that our apparent lack of enthusiasm was our fault. Evidently,
the things we heard from our parents hadn't filled our ears with
the resonance of the ages or our hearts with great expectations.
Most kids grew up with nothing more concrete than Lassie Come
Home to work with. In my case, I saw the past through the eyes
of two characters from the Rocky and Bullwinkle Show, Mr.
Peabody and his boy Sherman, who stepped into the time machine
and appeared in all of the great moments of history. It was only
after watching this cartoon at the age of four that I first
suspected what would not really hit me until a few years later –
that my parents and ancestors had been a part of history and
that cartoons would be the medium for all of my revelations.
Yet another problem in pinning down historical fact is that in
my family, what we children were told about our heritage
depended not only on the occasion but also on the teller. The
Golden family is a large one. I've always had dozens of aunts
and uncles, great aunts and uncles, cousins and second cousins,
not to mention those who merged into the herd by means of
matrimony. This has meant sorting through a lot of discrepancies
and contradictions and the bending of the truth to suit a
personal need. Every child knows the joke about the five miles
of snow through which parents had to walk to school, before
there were busses and four car families. These are the harmless,
obviously suspicious meanderings from the truth used to engender
guilt. However, when tales of world conflict, economic
depression, and wars are used to make an acute parental point,
history is in trouble. Compound all of this uncertainty with our
generational fear of the future and the specter of a
self-perpetuating technological wasteland and you are left with
neo-gothic comics and heavy metal music.
And now my job is to sort all this out?
[Frame 1: Mirrored image of Nick's half-shaved face, reflection
of bathroom door to right side of the mirror. Bubble captions
come through the keyhole. Sound words at doorknob: Click.
Rattle.]
"Hey Nick, open up. What the fuck you doing in there, anyway?"
My cousin Jake sounds like Olive Oil. He's thirteen and hates
what puberty's doing to his voice. I look at myself: my naked
legs stretching down from under my boxer shorts, my feet,
weathered and dry from too many shoeless walks on the beach and
too little foot care. I look up at the mirror and see a growling
expression beneath the shaving cream. "Shaving. Whaddya think."
A stream of curses flows in through the keyhole, through which
Jake is obviously looking: "You're not the only one who's gotta
be clean for this thing."
[Frame 2: Nick smiles into mirror. Motion lines around edges of
door. Sound word: Thud.]
"When I'm finished, I'll let your know."
He gives the door a kick that he'd like to give me and stomps
down the hall. I look at the mirror and see that my humor has
improved. Something about irritating Jake cheers me up, even in
the morning. It's hard to believe I'm going on thirty-five and
supposed to be mature.
The thing Jake just referred to is a wedding. Freddy's getting
married today. And I'm here to take a fateful step of my own. If
I don't take it, I won't have to bother driving back to San
Francisco tonight because Carmen will have the locks changed. I
guess Freddy and I are just two more "Walkers on the Golden path
with nothing to Gaine," as one family joke expresses it.
A man ahead of his time
My Great Grandmother, Virginia Walker, set the tone for
generations of jokes when she married Walker Gaine. The old
adage about not losing a daughter but gaining a son took on new
meaning. As Virginia's father put it, "One Walker loses and one
Walker gains." This is the kind of humor that I have grown up
with.
But I guess I shouldn't start with Virginia Walker. The earliest
family member in the present collective memory is my Great Great
Grandfather, Thomas Jefferson Walker, Great Grandma Virginia's
father.
Now that I think of it, this is just like those Russian novels
that I complained about having to read in college, the ones I
wanted to throw – actually the ones I did throw in some cases –
against a wall. One, I think it was War and Peace, skidded and
hopped half-way across the cold gray cement and polyethylene
surfaces of the Greyhound bus station in downtown San Francisco
before coming to a halt in a grimy corner. Nobody really took
notice: it was one of the more harmless acts committed in that
building, and people were probably unsure what I might be
capable of if they remarked on my outburst.
The point is, there are a lot of people in my family, all moving
around a point in the past like electrons around some mysterious
nucleus. No wonder I've been confused.
[Frame 3: Scene is a dark attic space with a small window and
low eaves. Cardboard boxes, labeled "Walker," "Black Oak
School," and "Golden," several small wooden cases, a trunk, and
two wooden chairs stand near the window. A flash of lightning is
visible in the window. Several Semi-opaque figures in 19th
century garb sit on the chairs and the trunk. They are obviously
ghosts.]
My information about Thomas Jefferson Walker, or T.J., as I call
him came from two sources: family anecdotes and the family
archive. The family archive is a mass of old letters, diaries,
photo albums and other records. Whether these papers have been
forgotten or they're being ignored is unclear, but they have
been mysteriously handed down from generation to generation,
added to by contributions of the descendants entrusted with the
family past. I used to think that these documents had passed
from one chosen keeper of secrets to another, like some
freemason's password or a Rosicrucian relic, but I finally
realized that this family treasure fell into the hands of
whoever found it in an attic and couldn't bear to throw it away.
For the present, this person is my father's twin sister, my Aunt
Lucy.
But even these letters and photographs, which would seem to be
hard and fast evidence, do not provide the last word on my
family, for the truth pieced together phrases from old bits of
paper, snatches of old stories, and mute objects seems no match
for the self-proclaimed authority of Aunt Lizzy, my father's
oldest sister. The most coherent teller of family anecdotes,
Aunt Lizzy should be visualized with a black whistle hanging
around her neck and ice blue eyes. She dominates any
conversation in the room at will and is generally feared by her
siblings. She tells us how it is, how it was and how it will be
with the Golden family and the world, leading me to ask myself
what some curious relative of the future will find as evidence
of my life? My comics? And what will they glean from those? Will
I be believed?
[Frame 4: Nick stares into mirror, but where his face should be,
he sees the visual cliché of a post-revolutionary figure with
white wig, three-cornered hat in his hands. Cloud borders around
image suggest a dream or flashback.]
The letters and records in a box marked "Walker" have revealed
that Thomas Jefferson Walker was born in 1823, during the Monroe
government and what one of my American History books called the
"Era of Good Feelings." His parents were Alexander and Bethany
Walker, cotton manufacturers and supporters of John Quincy Adams
in the election of 1824. So far, this seems factual enough.
However, there is more, for example, something I heard from Aunt
Lizzy when I was ten years old. I had just been watching Rocky
and Bullwinkle and observed Mr. Peabody go back to the Civil
War. Having long since deduced that since there was always a Mr.
Peabody in historical situations, there must also have been a
member of the Golden family in all phases of history, I asked
Aunt Lizzy what our family had been doing the second half of the
19th Century.
She told me that Walkers had stood in favor of strong national
government and against slavery, emphasizing that they opposed
slavery because they were morally offended by it. I accepted
this blindly, it being what most children in my position would
want to believe; however, when I read the family letters some
years later, I began to suspect that the Walkers might have
opposed slavery because they could afford to, having had their
own supply of cheap labor in the steady waves of poor and
desperate immigrants that kept dashing up against the New
England shores.
The Walker family's cotton mill was small, one of many
precursors to the huge manufacturers that soon appeared along
the Merrimac River. According to Aunt Lizzy, Alexander Walker
had had the chance to become one of the great industrialists of
his time by agreeing to a merger, but had been to idealistic to
give up personal control of the family business.
[Frame 5: A much younger Nick is sitting in an arm chair. Aunt
lizzy stands, towering over where he sits, her eyes locked on
his. Her bubble caption: Your Great-Great-Great Grandfather was
a tribute to the American tradition of small business. Nick's
thought Bubble: We could've been rich…]
As a manufacturer of southern cotton, Alexander experienced a
lot of ups and downs during the national government's decades of
struggle to find a system of duties and taxes that would satisfy
the New England businessmen, the Southern farmers, and the
nation's own need for revenues. One key conflict in this
historical struggle, which I found mentioned in several letters
between Alexander and his brother Frederick, not only helps
characterize the Walker family but more clearly shows my
difficulty in transforming bits and pieces of information into a
coherent family history.
The background for the conflict was this: in 1828 and 1832,
Congress imposed tariffs on cotton, which the southerners
considered unfair. In 1832, South Carolina decided to flatly
reject these tariffs, on the grounds that the Federal Government
had no right to interfere with their trade. The President did
not wait long to react and sent a warship into Charleston
harbor. T.J.'s father, Alexander Walker, praised this action in
his letters, adding that it was more than time to show those
Southerners who was boss. However, when, instead of blasting
those South Carolinians with a cannon ball or two, the president
offered them Henry Clay's Compromise Tariff of 1833, Alexander
Walker threw a fit and cursed that "Southern hick of a Democrat
President in ex-revolutionary hide" who was "finally showing his
true confederate colors." In this statement he was referring to
Andrew Jackson.
This disturbed me. By my junior year in high school, when I
first discovered these old letters, I had learned that Jackson
was the personification of democracy in his time. He was the
archetypal Democrat, after Jefferson. And being a child of my
own time, I naturally connected Democracy with Equality and the
Democratic Party with Civil Rights. How did this all fit
together? My contemplation of this problem and the reading I did
to alleviate my irritation at the apparent contradiction let me
to discover yet another conflict of sources, another barrier
hindering my search for a personal past.
I had already realized that Aunt Lizzy, my main source of family
history, was not as interested in detailed or accurate political
analysis as in the representation of positive family attributes,
such as moral strength, right thinking, and duty to the family.
And it was clear that the letters and personal records in the
archive were biased. However, then I learned that my main source
of official history during the first sixteen years of my life
had been watered down, ideologically manipulated textbooks. Is
it any wonder that I was distraught?
Of course, I later realized that, in Alexander Walker's days,
the Republicans were considered the party that freed the slaves
and that the Democrats were the bad guys; and that, then as now,
equality was a relative term. But my penchant for critical
listening was just budding, and in my childhood, I had swallowed
everything whole.
In any case, I learned from the Walker letters that Alexander
Walker had hated Andrew Jackson. And why? Because Alexander
Walker had loved John Quincy Adams, the sixth president of the
United States, and John Quincy Adams had considered Andrew
Jackson a complete dolt. In fact, Adams' dislike was so great
that when Andrew Jackson was offered an honorary degree from
Harvard University, Adams refused to attend the ceremony,
swearing that President Jackson couldn't even write his own name
and should not be allowed to set foot on university property,
much less receive academic honors. Thus influenced by his own
business interests and the opinion of a man he greatly
respected, Alexander Walker's prejudice against Andrew Jackson
grew. In a letter to his brother Frederick, Alexander Walker put
it this way:
You might at least be honest, my dear brother, and admit that
you like the man only because he is giving away land in the West
for next to nothing and that this suits your present need. I
don't know why you have bought land in that desolate uncivilized
wilderness. You should never have left the mill. Why do you
think the Whigs made the donkey the emblem of the Democratic
Party when Jackson came into office? Why do you think that
animal is called a "Jack"ass?
I admit, I was like to think the best of him at the beginning,
his being an orphan, and rising up to his destiny the way he
did. And he showed promise, in the beginning, of being a friend
to the businessman. But I ask you, where is a man from Tennessee
finally going to place his allegiance? With us? I dare say not.
He will side with those planters when forced into a corner. My
lord, he has done so already.
This letter was dated from some time in 1836, shortly before
Jackson was voted out of office, which would have made my Great
Great Grandfather T.J. about 13 years old. By then it seems that
Alexander and his son had a tradition of violent bickering on
political issues. T.J. seems to have sided with his Uncle Fred,
as some of his earliest letters to Frederick Walker reveal:
Father shows an increasing lack
of democratic moderation in his views, Uncle. I wish you were
here to defend the opinions which you and I share, for Father
and I can no longer converse on the subject of the government
without bouts of shouting, followed by days of silence, both of
which distress mother greatly.
But political differences were
not the main area of conflict between father and son, for
Alexander Walker was a businessman and he had conceived a son
for one basic purpose – to take over the family business.
Unfortunately, T.J. showed absolutely no interest in the
manufacture of cotton and when he finally enrolled at Yale in
1843, it was only because his father had threatened to
disinherit him completely if he did anything else.
[Frame 6: T.J. Walker sits at a wooden table, his eyes directed
toward his hands, folded on the table. Behind him, his father,
paces. Father's speech bubble: Yale will set you to rights.
T.J.'s thought bubble: Whatever.]
With this conflict I can identify, for in our family, the
profession one chooses is absolutely everybody's business.
When I was studying for my M.F.A. in Art, my relatives asked me
"What are you going to do with a degree in that?" As if an Art
degree were some dirty rag. This just proved to me how little
they knew about the ability of art to transform the drab
experiences of daily life into something extraordinary and
wonderful. Like my experience with mold…
[Frame 7: A saucepan sits on a counter. Although a lid has been
placed on the pan, its edge is not resting on the lip, but
rather on a raised cushion of stiff green foam, which seems to
be growing out of the pan. Short wavy lines emanate from the
mass. Motion-scent words float in the air surrounding the pan:
Ooze. Seep. Reek. Nick sits at the kitchen table reading, his
back to the pan. His look is quizzical. Thought bubble: Sniff?]
Once my roommate and I let an old pot of soup stand on our
kitchen window sill until the mold within began pushing up the
lid, revealing a sponge-like mass of firm, foamy gunk. It
reached a height of five-and-one-half inches before we finally
threw the pot away. Instead of feeling guilty about my poor
housekeeping habits or the wastefulness of throwing away a
perfectly good pot, reactions of which my mother would have
approved, I began to imagine something completely different. I
imagined that the stuff had invaded our lungs, where it was
waiting to push out of our mouths under the right incubation
conditions.
I envisioned colors: a background of anthracite gray, olive
green mold with streaks of chartreuse, sort of fluorescent. Then
a title came to mind. It would be called, "You are what you
eat...eventually." I pictured an epidemic, which attacked the
most corrupted, the weakened, or perhaps the secretly mutated
parts of the body. Everyone developed mold in different places:
in their ears, edging over the tops of their shoes, peeking out
from behind belts...and everyone was on the look out for mold
showing up in others.
[Frame 8: Same kitchen. Same pose. The kitchen is covered with
dripping, creeping masses of mold. Nick's body has begun to
decompose, but he's still reading.]
This kind of experience led me to study Art and to end up in
comics. What other medium could be the showplace for such
visions? But if Art was a dubious major, you can imagine what my
family thought of a career in comics. And do I care? Do I care
if they misinterpret my stories or find the jokes unfunny, or
fail to recognize that there is a punch line at all?
I can understand T.J.'s unwillingness to fulfill his family's
social imperative. I think it's admirable that my great great
grandfather lived up to his negative potential despite all
opportunity for upward mobility. What I find even more
interesting was the fact that he was probably one of the
earliest examples of the American practice of going to college
to escape family responsibility; for although T.J. Walker was
sent to Yale to become socially and intellectually competent, he
went to college for completely different reasons. His letters
home were full of references to the important social reformers
like Dorothea Dix, of his own comparisons between doctors in
insane asylums and the professors at Yale, and of his remarks
about being in intellectual chains. When he wasn't ranting
radical dogma, he was going on about Samuel Morse and the
telegraph, about the railroad, or about the importance of both
to the future of America. In short, he caught the fever of
Manifest Destiny.
Looking at these letters now, I can't imagine how Alexander
Walker missed the fact that his son was a compulsive
personality, and that his compulsions were divided between two
thoroughly contradictory movements of his time – technological
progress at all costs, and utopian escapism. That he would never
amount to anything is clear from where I stand. Of course, my
parents never noticed that 10,000 hours of cartoon watching
might affect my career goals either.
[Frame 9: A young T.J. stands before a stately building labeled
Yale, back to the viewer. He has a suitcase in his hand. His
thought bubble is divided into two parts by a slash: On one side
is the image of a woman in a state of planned deshabile. She is
bending down to fix a garter. On the other side is the image of
a steam locomotive, a puff of smoke emiting from its chimney.]
At college T.J. heard a lecture by former Yale student of
Theology, John Humphrey Noyes. Although T.J. was allegedly in
his final year of study, he and another classmate decided to
join Noyes' commune at Oneida, a community somewhere in New York
State. What and where I learned about this great social
experiment is a good example of the kind of detective work I've
had to.
I first heard reference to the Oneida Community, during the time
my parents and my Aunt Lucy were thinking about joining a rural
commune up in Northern California. I was seven years old and
scared to death that we would end up moving away from the Sunset
District of San Francisco, where I had lived in since my birth.
I already had a healthy fear of the suburbs, where there were no
streetcars or trolley busses, so the idea of a country town
terrified me. I was used to such pastimes as hiking up to the
top of the hill on our street, jumping on a skateboard, tearing
down toward the busy intersection at the bottom and grabbing
onto the pole of the street light near the corner to stop. This
and community baseball in Golden Gate Park, where we caught our
coaches slipping off to smoke a joint between innings,
constituted the only childhood I could imagine. To make matters
worse, I had been told that the people in the commune lived from
their own farming and handicrafts. I envisioned myself behind a
plough. Since the Real McCoys was rerunning at the time, I
pictured myself dressed like Little Luke. Also, although I had
seen my mom do hippie stuff like make pottery, hand-dye fabric,
or help with the harvest up at the family's boarding school in
Sacramento, I had never once seen George touch the dirt at all –
with an implement or without one; and even though it was his
family who actually owned the family school and its adjoining
farm, I had never seen him do anything more physical than take a
meandering walk along the river and, once a year, clean the
windows. Of course, he had helped Aunt Lizzy evaluate textbooks
and stuff like that. And I had seen him l go without sleep for
days when he was preparing some journalistic masterpiece. Still,
I was sure that this was not the kind of talent or endurance
necessary to farm work. In short, I was worried. And so I
started paying attention to the adult conversations around me.
On the day before Thanksgiving, I heard mom remark to Aunt Lucy
that "the commune" would probably be the theme of that year's
family celebration at the Willows, the family boarding school.
When we drove up to Sacramento the next day, George, mom and
Aunt Lucy naturally included this subject in the casual chatter.
My cousin Stacy and I were sitting in the back, separated from
one another by Aunt Lucy. Stacy was riding up to the Willows
with us because her mother, my Aunt Daisy, had been in Reno for
a couple of days, gambling away her year's hoard of silver, and
Stacy had been staying with us the entire week as a result.
My flashback halts for a moment. I consider the expanding list
of players and entangled relationships invading my storyline I
have had numerous nightmares about them.
In one, I was skiing down a hill. Surrounded by white silence. I
felt like I was moving in slow motion. Then I heard a rumbling
behind me. Avalanche was my first thought. Ever since one of my
school friends had been caught in one, I'd been nervous. I
looked back to see if the slope was about to descend upon me,
but instead I saw a giant snowball – as they appear in the
cartoons, of course – filled with the living bodies of the
Golden family.
[Frame 10: Nick is positioned on a snowy slope, his body facing
downhill. His motion is stopped in mid-step; his head sharply
turned toward the uphill slope behind him, where he sees a giant
snowball racing toward him. Arms and legs protrude out of the
snowball, all flailing and waving. Standing on the sidelines, in
a gimpy old-person posture and waving a cane, is his
grandmother, Grandma Golden. Nick's thought caption: ?!?!?
Grandmother's thought bubble: Chuckle. Additional bubble
captions emanate from all angles of the snowball.
…Who's idea is this anyway?
…I think we might be out of control
…You THINK???
…Ouch!
…I don't have any feeling in my legs…or arms…or fingers!!!
…Is this the best your fantasy can do?
…Oh, so he's the victim. And us?
…We're cannon fodder for his neuroses.]
I think of my father's siblings: Lizzy, Charles, Charlotte,
Jane, Daisy, and Lucy. They are all named after fictional
characters, according to the family habit of concept naming;
however, because I cannot relate to the novels of Jane Austen,
Henry James or E.M. Forster, even though I have been forced to
read those in which these characters appear, I have created a
list of my own historical allusions: Lizzy Borden; Charles
Goodyear; Charlotte's Web, Jane, his wife, Jetson; Daisy Duck; I
Love Lucy, and St. George. These are not the characters they
were named for and only Lucy found my little joke really
amusing.
In the car of my flashback sat two characters from this list, my
father George (at the wheel) and my Aunt Lucy (back seat in the
middle), together with my mother Madeleine (suicide seat), my
cousin Stacy and me (on either side of Aunt Lucy).
"Anastasia," I silently lip-synched to my cousin, which she
responded to with a jab behind Aunt Lucy's back. Aunt Lucy had
leaned forward between the two front seats and was talking to
mom and George. "Anastasia," I mouthed again, pressing myself
against the car door out of her range. My cousin hated her real
name.
Acting on Aunt Lucy's advice, Aunt Daisy had named her daughter
for the mysteriously vanishing Russian princess. Aunt Lucy had
always loved Ingrid Bergman in the movie Anastasia.
Nevertheless, Anastasia Golden, my cousin, seemed to mistrust
her name from the beginning, and on the first day of first
grade, she renamed herself Stacy. But cousins never forget, and
so teasing her about her name was as traditional as a
Thanksgiving turkey or Christmas stockings.
[Frame 11: The interior of a car as seen from the rear window.
Aunt Lucy is leaning forward between the fronts seats, talking
to the George and Madeleine. The backs of their heads are close
together. Stacey is jabbing Nick behind Lucy's back. Nick's
attention, however, is momentarily frozen on the back of his
aunt's head. George's caption: They were hardly orgies, Lucy.
Nick's thought bubble: Orgies?!?]
Busy with my cousin, I mostly ignored what the adults said
during the trip, until they began discussing the commune, the
prospect of which, as I've already said, terrified me. Thus, I
was listening when Aunt Lucy chuckled evilly and said, "Our
little experiment is harmless compared to the orgies that went
on at Oneida." My pre-adolescent ears perked up. But George and
my mother only laughed, after which the subject changed. Later,
at Aunt Lizzy's, when I was hanging around the chip and dip
assortment trying to remain unnoticed, I heard the subject come
up again. Since I was curious as to what kind of orgies an old
geezer from the last century could have been involved in and
what that might have to do with the hippie commune that my
parents and aunt wanted to schlep me off to, I shifted my
concentration from the Cheeto bowl to the conversation.
George sat in an overstuffed chair which was covered in that
old-fashioned carpet like upholstery that scratches you when
you're wearing short pants and often has a kind of fan pattern
pressed into its surface. His long, loosely linked limbs were
stretched out in several directions. Aunt Lizzy hated it when he
sat like this, but he did it just to irritate her, as he had
once admitted to mom and me. If Lizzy sounds as if she were
George's mother instead of his sister, it's because she's
fourteen years older. So, there was George, sprawled on the
chair, while Aunt Lizzy eyed him with evident displeasure. My
mother was silent; she mostly refused to take part in the family
discussions, preferring to corner individuals one-on-one.
"What on earth could you have against it, Lizzy," said George
slowly. "You work on a similar principle here, growing
everything you eat at the school."
Aunt Lizzy's lips took on a subtle edge. "Don't be an idiot.
We're a family business."
"You have non-family employees, and some of them live in the
dormitory."
"I'm not going to argue with you. A boarding school is not a
commune."
"Communes are in the family blood though, you can't deny that."
From the conversation in the car, I guessed what George was
referring to. Aunt Lizzy's eyebrows said that she knew what he
meant, but it was Aunt Lucy who responded. "That's right, Great
Grandpa Walker was at Oneida, and that community still exists
today."
"It was one of the first great utopian experiments in our
country," said George brightly.
Aunt Lizzy made a "Hrmph" noise. "That old fool almost drove
this family into financial ruin. If you're following in his
footsteps, we can expect the worst."
Uncle Charles voiced a tentative protest, "Let's be fair, he was
one of the men who built our nation's first transcontinental
railroad, and he founded this school."
"And it would have gone to ruin if Great Aunt Rochelle hadn't
run it," Lizzy countered.
George sighed. "Getting back to the point, Miss Elizabeth, you
must admit that the Oneida Community and its status in our
history proves that communal life has a tradition in this
country and is not some new-fangled radical plot."
I giggled. The expression "new fangled" sounded funny coming out
of my father's mouth. It is one of his talents to adjust his
vocabulary to that of his partner in conversation. I now know
why he does this, but when I was a child, it seemed as if he was
always becoming someone else.
At that point, Aunt Charlotte's voice drifted in from the dining
room, "Will someone get in here and help me get this food on the
table?" Since my aunts generally combine the wording of a
request and the tone of a command, the discussion ended
abruptly.
[Frame 12: A high school classroom. The teacher, his back still
to the class, has just written the phrase History of Reform on
the chalkboard. Teacher's thought bubble: I wonder if I should
sign onto that retirement plan? Several students, viewed from a
three-quarter angle are in postures of inattention. Nick is
clearly identifiable. His eyes are half closed. His thought
bubble: Zzzz. Other thought bubbles float above the heads of
various students: What time is it? Where did he get that suit?
Asshole.]
When my parents decided not to join the commune, the subject of
T.J. Walker's experiences in Oneida dropped out of my life,
until approximately ten years later, when I was sitting in Mr.
Jansen's American History class. He said something about the
Oneida community, whereupon I awoke from my usual fifth period
nap. Raising my hand, I said that my great great grandfather
taken part in the commune. Jansen's mouth turned up slightly at
the corners, the way it always did when he was interrupted in
his monologue and forced to look one of us in the eye. He
thought that by successfully mimicking a friendly expression, he
could prevent us from noticing that he thought we were dumb
punks. "How interesting," he said. "Maybe you could tell us more
about the colony." I realized how stupid I'd been in thinking he
could help me achieve enlightenment on any subject, so I shook
my head and went back to sleep. Despite Jansen's deflating
disinterest, however, the mention of the Oneida Community
prompted me to complete a thought that, as I've already said,
Mr. Peabody and his boy Sherman had initiated years before, that
history was something we lived in, but we didn't know it yet,
and that a 3-D version of my family lay hidden in the bundle of
dates we were being put to sleep with in high school.
Still under the influence of this light-bulb experience, I went
to the public library and looked up information on James
Humphrey Noyes and the Oneida colony. What happened next changed
my life in a lot of ways. First, the librarian kicked my out for
laughing in the stacks, upon which I went to George, looking for
more information. I asked him if he had ever investigated the
subject. He said enough to reveal that he already knew about
everything I'd just found out, upon which I asked him what else
he'd failed to tell me, but George was not easy to provoke: he
just shrugged and referred me to Aunt Lucy, "the keeper of the
skeletons" as he termed her. This led me to the collection of
family letters, some of which I have already quoted here,
letters that no one had much mentioned, that no one except Aunt
Lucy and, to some extent, George, had even read.
Aunt Lucy was happy to have someone show some interest in her
archive, which was housed in a little room that I'd never paid
much attention to, it being nothing more than a confusion of
books, folders, boxes and file drawers. Once she turned on a
lamp, she opened a box, rooted around in it for a few seconds,
and produced a packet of papers marked "Thomas Jefferson Walker,
childhood/college/Oneida". I looked around. This was evidently
the tip of an iceberg. I saw a box marked "Walker", one marked "Gaine",
and at least three marked "Golden". The packet had come out of
the Walker box, which was full of other packets, loose papers
and photos. There didn't seem to be much from the part of T.J.'s
life that I was interested in, but I sat down on the floor and
began reading. After awhile, I found a letter from T.J.'s
mother, Bethany Walker, that seemed to refer to the commune.
Dear Tom,
Father has a new mare. We took him out for the first time
yesterday. We weren't ten paces onto the big road when Father
let him out. That horse took off like I don't know what. I
presume Father was thinking of you as he sped that horse. They
were both in a sweat in the end.
We have laid a new carpet in the study, and all of the woodwork
will be painted by the time you come home for your birthday and
Christmas. You will be coming home, won't you? Painting walls
seems the fashion now, but I don't know as I like the grain of
the wood better. Your Father will be modern.
I was sorry that you weren't here for your Grandfather's
birthday. We thought of you all the while and there were a great
many silences at the table. I have to tell you that Father is
mighty angry and your Sister Puss cries herself to sleep some
nights. I've always set store by your good sense, but I must
admit that this great experiment is a blow to any good
Christian. I dread seeing the Reverend Jasper every Sunday,
although he has been very tolerant in his criticism of you.
Your mother.
Considering this letter now, I see in it the prototype for
numerous telephone conversations between my own mother and me in
which she attempted to resolve one of George's and my father-son
conflicts by appearing to hover above the plane of crass power
struggle on the wings of maternal tolerance, making both of us
feel guilty about our own drives for self-assertion. I now view
this role of "harmonizer" more skeptically, but in those days, I
wasn't ready to find this aspect of Bethany Walker's letter
interesting and moved on to a letter from T.J. to his mother,
one that shed a bit more light on the commune.
Dearest Mother,
What can be more Christian than a life based on the Bible? It is
our only law. Can you say that the people outside live by this
law as strictly? What has been termed a life of license by our
critics is truly a life of searching for the Perfect form of
Christian life. I am sending you a pamphlet that we have
prepared. Mr. Noyes believes that all of the doubts about Oneida
can be best resolved with information.
To this information I can only add that I am not hurt by your
words, nor by Father's. One of our greatest beliefs here is that
"Criticism is a privilege." It is indeed an active principle in
our daily lives. Without this, we cannot attain the Perfection
that God wants from us....
The pamphlet was not in the letter, but I had found enough
information in the library to guess what T.J. was referring to.
I left the chaos of Aunt Lucy's book room to join her in the
kitchen, where she was making us a cup of green jasmine tea. She
was wearing a pink, green, black and silver flowered robe and
stiff straw Japanese house shoes; her hair was pulled back into
a loose knot. Aunt Lucy had nothing like Asian features, but she
always seemed transformed by what she was wearing. It was kind
of a companion characteristic to George's ability to change
verbal personalities at will.
Aunt Lucy looked up from pouring boiling water into a low wide
teapot. "Did you find what you wanted," she said smiling
slightly, nodding at the letters still in my hand.
I didn't know what to say. I didn't really know what I'd been
looking for, and yet I was somehow disappointed in what I'd
found. I'd expected a great drama, but had discovered the
apparently uneventful.
"I guess Great Great Grandpa Thomas was considered a pretty wild
guy, huh?"
Aunt Lucy nodded. "I would think so."
I opened one of the letters: "Listen to this: What has been
termed a life of license by our critics is truly a life of
searching for the Perfect form of Christian life." I gazed into
Aunt Lucy's inscrutable eyes. "What does he mean?" I could tell
from her responding shrug that she didn't get my question. "I
mean...there seems to be this mixture of Bible preaching and
some kind of weird stuff called complex marriage and male
continence. Last night, I asked George if he'd ever heard of
male continence, but he just said it was a "Catholic plot." Oh,
and then he said, "Marriage is always complex."
Aunt Lucy laughed. "I'm not an expert, but I think male
continence is sex with delayed or repressed ejaculation; There's
something similar in the Taoist religion. It's supposed to
increase pleasure."
I felt myself floating on the mixed feelings that these words
evoked as they came out of her mouth and decided to steer the
conversation away from the topic of extended hard-ons. "And what
about Complex marriage? It doesn't sound very Puritan."
Aunt Lucy took the letter out of my hand and studied it for a
moment. "I think complex marriage is some form of polygamy …"
"I thought polygamy was when a man had more than one wife. This
sounds like everybody was married to everybody else."
"Oh well," she said, as she poured out the tea.
"Really, Aunt Lucy. I read in the library that they used to keep
records of who did it with who so that everybody got a fair
deal."
Aunt Lucy raised her eyebrows and got what my mother called a
devilish look. "If you know so much about it, why are you
asking?" She stared at me for a minute, but then her interest
seemed to shift. "Did you find anything else of interest in
there?"
"It could take years to find everything of interest in there."
"Well, any time you're bored, just come over and sift through a
bit of the family dust...and dirt."
I nodded, happy to see the conversation turn to something other
than sex, a topic I didn't exactly want to talk to my Aunt
about, no matter how cool she was.
That conversation I saved for the next day, when I went straight
to Mr. Mankewicz, the horny old panda of a man who tried to
teach us art. He was a major confidant at that time of my life.
With him I discussed the concept of male continence in complete
detail, learning more than I ever wanted to know about
subtleties of sex at a time when I was overwhelmed by the most
rudimentary of physiological truths.
However, T.J. was much older than seventeen when he went into
the Oneida colony, so maybe he was ready for complex sexual
practices. Or maybe it was the rigors of male continence that
drove him out. In any case, he left the colony in 1851 and aside
from several family sayings such as "Criticism is a privilege"
and "Great Leaders are not chosen, they are found," the origins
of which I had just discovered, little of his experiences seems
to have seeped into the outside world.
So what did I learn from all this? I accumulated some odd facts
about sex and the institution of marriage. But I also discovered
something important about the nature of homilies and expressions
of domestic wisdom: that they run through all families, that
they are rampant in ours, and that they are usually passed down
without their context, which can be dangerous.
For example, I always thought that everyone used the phrase
"Criticism is a privilege." I thought it was American, like "the
pursuit of happiness," or "everything you say can be used
against you." When I brought home a lousy report card, when I
whined in defense that my teacher picked on me, George would
smile and say "Criticism is a privilege." When I talked about my
best friend being voted captain of the little league team, he'd
say, "Great leaders are not elected, they are found." I
naturally assumed that these phrases were generic parental
material like "Who do you think you are?" or "You never know
when to stop, do you."" or "I only have two hands.". However,
somewhere around the third or fourth grade, I noticed that I
never heard these particular phrases outside of my family. And
when I was seventeen, I suddenly learned they came from a
family-specific context. This didn't seem such a huge revelation
in itself, but it was enough to further pique my already budding
curiosity about the relationship between my family and my
personally warped sense of reality.
|
|
|